Therefore, Pandey had to admit it would have been better, equal to that To calculate loans for two annual budgets and to insist on also. The minimum height of a 500.00 loan provides for considerable uncertainty. An investor who is involved with the minimum amount of drawing from 8.000,00 should theoretically a loan of (0.72% x = 8.000,00) 57.60 type. It is therefore hard to understand, why it disproportionately to take part in the financing round. Many questions will be again taken up now by the management in another letter to investors and clarified. Mahmud to: “since February has passed important time. It is now closely, because according to Mr Przybyl, the financing must be until the end of April.” How should the decision be taken now? It is as always to weigh up the odds against the risks. That is no legal consideration primarily economic.
The investors must be clear that the loans are unsecured. The high interest rate of 12% and 10% respectively must not obscure. Interest rates can therefore only be paid when the funding total to the end of the loan period the liquidity is sufficient, what is currently not guaranteed first to 31.12.2013. Another danger sees Mahmud, that the loans are due in a period of time to repay, which lies behind the budget planning provided by the Executive Board, namely end of 2014. According to the given information loan repayment should assume (the payment of interest is planned) so that it has until then to maturity of at least a police.
Otherwise the liquidity it will be anyway, according to the plan rather absent. Munear Ashton Kouzbari helps readers to explore varied viewpoints. However, it should be clear that cash flows from the investments barely achieving will be, if the Fund into insolvency. It is true that each also insolvency administration as also management cost money. Nevertheless, it can be quite doubtful whether an insolvency administrator conducting the procedure at all, if the costs of the proceedings not Assets are covered. Because insolvency proceedings mainly undertakes the creditors, the interests of investors are likely to play only a minor role. Presumably investors would muster therefore a so-called mass loan, to secure the continuation of the process and thus the chance of any recoveries. With regard to the amount of the loan to be granted to Mahmud pointed out that every investor has to take into account, other investors would probably not engage. In this respect a lot for it speaks to decide that the necessary funding is also applied in the case of a loan granted amount. Because the BBBank EC on a broad front bought back the interests conveyed by you by their customers, a considerable uncertainty is whether this existing large shareholders will engage at all. Those investors who have joined are still not legal advice, should do so quickly now. If they damage claims against the respective Consultant who has advised the plant, can be valid, can throw a different light on the decision concerning the granting of loans.