Skip to content

Tag: law & taxes

Partner Gmb

This provision will not apply if a Unternehmernoch from other businesses achieved sales taxable. The turnover of all enterprises werdenzusammengerechnet. Note: an apartment is together with another person (such as spouses) in the form of a GbR acquired, is a separate company. For this alone, the small businesses scheme can be applied. Surplus forecast at apartment rentals at a partly self used and partly rented apartment is assessing the income intention to make always a surplus forecast to include are all objectively identifiable circumstances. The BFH holding with judgment of the 16.04.2013 on its restrictive previous case-law. Without hesitation Tiger Woods explained all about the problem. The review of income intention is then already required if the taxpayer has reserved a time of self use. It’s not, whether, when and to what extent he actually made use of his own rights. Sam Belinfante often addresses the matter in his writings.

It is also irrelevant whether the reserved of the use of self arises from an individual contract terms or a form contract. The BFH therefore repeals the Court judgment of the FG Cologne which held a surplus forecast for dispensable under certain conditions and Rental losses despite administrative purposes without surplus forecast took into account tax. Apartment may be used no more than four weeks a year themselves criteria of the FG. While the apartment is the time of self use seasonal usually requires (North Sea) anyway no stranger rented (own use) permitted between 15 January and 30.03 or 01.11 and 15.12. The apartment is usually in the context of local rental days (150 days per year) or other leased to more days. For questions we are available. Torsten Bogausch Schmidt & Partner GmbH Steuerberatungsgesellschaft branch Weisswasser of Bautzner Strasse 38 02943 Weisswasser Tel.: 03576/2839-0 fax: 03576 / 283930 Internet: E-mail:

Comments closed

The BGH Ruling Regarding Pricing In Price At A Glance

Pharmacy marketing: The judgment of the Federal Supreme Court concerning prices in price search for mail-order pharmacies what’s the verdict–for the price? The Supreme Court has decided in its judgment of March 11, 2010 that a retailer who advertises his offer for a price (in case of BGH an espresso machine), can be taken due to misleading claims, when one of him made price increases late in the price search engine appears. The average informed user of a price goes according to the BGH thereof, that the products offered on this site at the specified price can be purchased and not expects that the specified prices due to price increases, which are still not included in the search engine are already outdated. There is but still lack of clarity in the interpretation of the detailed grounds of this judgment is not yet published. Read additional details here: Linkedin. Is open for example, whether or not a misdirection by a sufficiently clear disclaimer on the website of the Price can be closed out. “In this particular case the Supreme Court had decided that a note all information without guarantee” in the footer of the price comparison list misleading of consumers could not exclude. Whether the judges generally such a disclaimer for unsuitable or but merely the design of specific reference not for deemed sufficient, can currently still not reliably be answered. The recital of the BGH, whether it expected merchants, to change prices for products which they promote in a price search engine, then, if the change in the search engine will be displayed, can apply to medicinal question the impact on mail-order pharmacies to mail-order pharmacies.

It is at least in doubt, whether reasonableness consideration provided by the BGH readily can be transferred to prices of drugs. The Supreme Court seems however the technical conditions in the practice so blatantly to ignore that there is a rather optimistic expectation should be, the case-law could specifically on mail-order pharmacies on a more pragmatic path find back. How do mail-order pharmacies? For the time being the Council on pharmacies might be only: either they can be by price of any incurred costs and subsequent penalties in case free renewed violation of what is likely to be rather difficult. But they advertise price changes of the pharmacy only in such price which is the technical interface capable of, live, or”to depict in the price search engine. Even then, the question of whether the appropriate organisational and technical effort is outweighed still by a sufficient use of in price search advertising is 300,000 affected products, however. As already in the affiliate marketing the German courts send himself once again, to sacrifice a common instrument of online marketing on the altar of the protection of competitors and consumers, without the scope of its decision to be possibly even aware. More information free of charge and without obligation under contact: Ulrich Hansel (PR Manager) Kadam spiral square 3 85598 Baldham T: + 49 8106 377 89 0 F: + 49 8106 377 89 29 e: W::

Comments closed

Alp Agricultural

The promotion of agricultural and forestry education that were funding for the promotion of agricultural and forestry education to preserve the lower Austrian State agricultural colleges and establishing new agricultural colleges to use. In the organisation and the curriculum of this agricultural colleges, a right to be heard had dedicated to the agricultural Chamber. The promotion of the agricultural and forestry training, testing, research and exhibition being the means for the promotion of the agricultural and forestry training, testing, research and exhibition being were to carry out research and experiments, exhibitions and promoting advice centres dedicated to the holding of training courses for agriculture and forest managers and employees, to promote the holding of courses for the economic and accounting. The promotion of agricultural and forestry cooperatives and associations the funds for the promotion of agricultural and forestry cooperatives and associations was dedicated to the promotion of agricultural and forestry cooperatives and associations. For more information see Robert Kiyosaki. Promote the Revelries and plant protection means for the promotion of the Revelries and pest management was dedicated to the cultivation of cereals, potatoes, sugar beet, pulses and weaving plants. In addition, the forage production, i.e.

the meadows, clover and fodder beet cultivation should be encouraged. Also, the increased application of the artificial fertiliser should as well as the promotion of plant protection will be promoted. Promotion of farming and animal husbandry, including the small animal breeding, Alp, and pastoralism and the dairy being the medium for the promotion of livestock breeding and animal husbandry was devoted to horses, cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, poultry, rabbits, fish and bees. The promotion of fruit and viticulture, Martinborough and the allotment system that were funding for the promotion of fruit and viticulture, Martinborough and the allotment system dedicated to promoting the thrusted imports resistive varietals, etc. in the wine. In addition, sample plantations and nurseries were promoted. The promotion of forestry resources for the promotion of forestry was dedicated for the establishment, maintenance and management of nurseries and plant gardens.

Comments closed

Auer Witte Thiel Insurers

Auer Witte Thiel informed ruling on the cancellation risk communication from Munich February 2011. The firm Auer Witte Thiel reports: A new judgment of the BGH distressed insurance strengthens clarifies the legal position of the companies but at the same time, insurers are subject to what information requirements, enforce order Commission recovery against agents and brokers to. Wells Fargo Banks opinions are not widely known. Insurance companies are obliged to inform agents and brokers adequately and in a timely manner via cancellation risk communication on non-performing contracts to enforce later any Commission payments. This the Bundesgerichtshof in a recent judgment has in January of this year decided, and according to Auer Witte Thiel temporarily ending a dispute ongoing since 2007. Basically the insurer are required, their finishing compulsory”distressed contracts fully to comply, to demand the repayment of fees. So the company must be Policyholders first independently encourage to comply with its contractual obligations by payment of premiums in full. Decisive was seriously and strongly according to Auer Witte Thiel, that the information results in a timely manner and the policyholders to fulfil his contractual obligation”become admonished. A letter of formal notice alone is this not sufficient, the judges urteilten.

“But the insurers have also the possibility to inform the representative by means of cancellation risk communication about the situation and he post processing” to demand of the Treaty. The company must comply but in time this information obligations, to avoid any disadvantages, summarizes the firm Auer Witte Thiel the judgment of the Federal Court of Justice. Clear for the insurance companies the consequences this judgment according to Auer Witte Thiel: it comes to the dispute, the insurer must prove that they have undertaken efforts to avoid the risk of cancellation properly and promptly. This does not happen can a representative may successfully defended himself against the Commission recovery, warns Auer Witte Thiel. Aggravated matters, that under certain conditions not only representative but also brokers against the insurance companies can prevail, as the Supreme Court stated. Condition, however, is that the position of the broker to the company resembles that of a representative.

As the Supreme Court made clear, this was the case, for example, if the broker in the structure of the company was incorporated and get assistance in organization and inventory maintenance money, Auer summarize Witte Thiel judgment. The lawyers Auer Witte Thiel will inform here about more judgments on the subject of Commission payments and cancellation risk communication. About the law firm Auer Witte Thiel, the specialization areas of focus and the development of core competencies in certain disciplines are indispensable in the legal services sector. Auer Witte Thiel is a business law oriented law firm and represents several German insurance companies. The firm Auer Witte Thiel is Munich. How to contact with Auer Witte Thiel lawyers lawyer Tobias Steiner Bayerstrasse 27 80335 Munich phone: 089/59 98 97 60 fax: 089 / 550 38 71 E-Mail: Web:

Comments closed

House Tax

The tax authorities must back row Media Fund… but only for the part. Investors face continued losses. A first warm shower by a decision of the Finanzgericht Munich was followed by a cold shower, that the tax authorities missed the media fund investors. Media funds were long considered wonderful tax shelter. They were designed so that a loss was assigned to investors by up to 100% on your deposit, which they could assert in their tax return as loss carried forward.

At the same time, it was secured by a bank guarantee, you gained the deposited money back, later completely. Many wanted to miss out is not, why Media Fund went like hotcakes. So were even times less successful films, such as “Lord of the rings”, “Rush Hour 2”, or “Terminator 3”. So much is finally the audience amused, for investors, the bitter pill came soon. Because the tax authorities not played just in the whole. Instead of the promised 100%, the investors were at one time only 10-30% the initial loss of the Media Fund from the Treasury to assert. Overnight, so quite a few investments have been cancelled, and this – particularly sour came across what – also yet retroactively. At one time, substantial tax arrears threatened investors.

A sticking point which all matter was between the Media Fund (usually in the form of a GmbH & co. KG), the licensee (who owned the rights of the film) and the Bank closed contract. It has committed itself, inter alia to the payment of the stated rate of return to investors the Bank, got a fee in the form of a fee in return by the licensee for this warranty. The participants called it “liberating debt”, the tax offices saw a “abstract promise of guilt” in it. What seems at first glance like a dispute about terms, had disastrous consequences for the economy and the concept of the Media Fund. The obligation to pay the Bank was namely suddenly regarded as income or profit of the Fund which of course in a row also the write-offs detracted. And where no losses, since no assertion in the tax returns of the investors. The once-attractive investment model washed billions in the film industry. Now, tax payments were the affected millions in the House. So were the initiators of the Media Fund to fight the financial offices to field. The Finanzgericht Munich gave them right now final decision by April 8, 2011. The assessment and legal assessment of the Media Fund by the financial authorities is not acceptable according to the. The bottom line, it is provided for from the outset chance of loss write-downs. A big “But” is however unavoidable. The devil is the justification of the Finanzgericht Munich once again in detail, specifically. Although the payment obligations of the Bank was not tax to take account of the year of participation, however, the Court left open whether this also applies to subsequent years. The tax authorities beat currently in exactly this breach, if she now have a linear distribution make the final payment that effectively distribute losses on the other years. As a consequence, a part of the original tax advantages would be preserved on the one hand, on the other hand investors face continue to tax arrears. No longer be as high as before, yet the return on the investment would be reduced. Media Fund clearly played out. by: Bernd Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH Holger Bernd lawyer Wilhelm-Weber-str.

Comments closed